Generally, I prefer the accessibility of iTunes and other online sources, since the programming is of my choice, usually free of interpretation by announcers and programmers. I recognize the trade-offs I make when I don the earbuds:
- The sonic range is limited by the device—by even the best headphones.
- Outside noise can affect the overall result—especialy with earbuds.
- Programming is still limited by the CDs and downloads that I've purchased—or taken as a loan from the public library—and by the limitations of the search algorithms installed in
Amazon.com , iTunes' Ping, and other services related to what I purchase or listen to while online.
Reporting a first hearing from the concert hall has its disadvantages.
- The performance and music must last in the memory and surpass the memories of other music heard in the same concert. The memory is truly dependent on the attitudes that inform the programmer, since often better memory occurs with either a fresh mind or with the latest impressions. Thus, the first and last pieces in a program have special prominence.
- Generally a concert listener is less aware of how long a new piece is. This lack of time sense means the listener can't use time to understand the piece and make it coherent through gauging the present moment in comparison to the beginning and end. Thus, the logical unifying of sound through motif, simultaneity, similarity, and contrast becomes subservient to the moment and to what awareness the listener can muster to retain each moment that occurred before.
- The listening location in the hall affects aspects of the balance between each performer. Although the better halls tend to produce a good blend of all the instruments for most seats, especially so for those in the middle of the orchestra and fronts of the balconies, the experience of each listener is different.
- Each performance suffers from—and some would say benefits from—the John Cage effect, where the whole experience consists of all the sounds in the venue, including the music made, the rustle of pages turned by the performers, and the coughs and crackling of
candy wrappers from the seat occupants next to you. - Finally, the perception of a performance is informed by the audience as a whole. Tepid or enthusiastic applause builds and supports an overall consensus of the effect of a piece.
The memory of "Overture: Parachute Dances" surpasses the hearings of the two later, larger parts of the program, Mozart's Symphony #39 and Strauss' "Ein Heldenleben." Though the length, breadth, and depth of Heldenleben might work against the memory of a lesser piece, Parachute Dancing holds its own indeed. The textures include polyphonic motif treatment—jumping from violins to cellos to brass and woodwinds, subtle and sometimes surprising utterances from a large percussion section—including superb moments for xylophone, and expanded timbres from the strings to include pizzicati and snapping the strings to the fingerboard. The piece lasts 6 minutes, give or take a bit, and every moment hangs on what has come before and informs later moments as they build toward culmination. I highly recommend buying one of the recorded performances of Parachute Dances, which is packaged as one of four works by Larsen or one of seven pieces by different composers.
For thoughts on Nixon in China,
